How Can You Measure Your Social Brand Equity? | Social Media Today

The concept of brand equity is changing fast. In the digital era, social media conversations make up a growing part of how a brand is perceived by its customers.

To stay competitive, brands have to stay on top of what customers are saying about their products online. If you’re not measuring your social brand equity, you risk missing out on key opportunities.

This leads to an important question – as a global brand, how should you measure your social brand equity? What are the metrics you should be following, and how often should you track them?

In this post, we’ll look at a set of four key questions to define and measure your social brand equity, and introduce you to the measurement framework our social data research team uses to turn these questions into meaningful insights.

First, though, let’s start with a quick recap.

Social brand equity: a quick recap

Brand equity is the value of a brand’s perception amongst consumers.

For Apple, brand equity is about cutting edge innovation and creativity.

For Rolex, it’s about luxury and prestige.

For Nike, it’s about an active yet fashionable lifestyle.

Brand equity is a crucial asset, as it helps to differentiate one company’s products from another – it’s why you’re willing to pay over $1,000 for a phone, or $10,000 for a watch, when you can get the same product with the same functions at a fraction of the price. This is why companies spend so much time and effort marketing their products to create a distinct impression in the minds of consumers.

It’s possible to break brand equity down into tangible factors, such as sales revenue, market share and consumer satisfaction. However, there’s a lot about brand equity that’s hard to describe – for example, how individuals feel about specific products.

Or it was, until the advent of social media.

In the pre-social media age, consumers had a much smaller platform to voice opinions, but now, anyone can put on the boxing gloves and jump on Twitter.

This evolution in communication has given consumers the ability to influence brand equity, and has turned brand equity into a constant exchange.

Businesses now have to work hard to stay visible on social media, and respond proactively to customer queries.

On the flip side, this has created huge opportunities for companies to define and measure their brand equity. With social listening, companies can channel billions of daily exchanges to understand their brand equity as they form and evolve.

But how, exactly?

Social media data can be bewildering if you don’t know what you’re looking for – there’s such a rich range of data out there, it can be impossible to know where to begin.

And even if you do know which questions to ask, you still need to narrow down the relevant information to understand how social media exchanges can reveal brand equity in the eyes of consumers.

Luckily, the social media analysts from Linkfluence have managed to boil it down to four simple questions.

4 key questions for measuring social brand equity

Measuring social brand equity involves a focus on the following questions:

If you can answer these questions with data-driven analysis, you’ll start to get a detailed and accurate picture of your social brand equity.

Now, as useful as these four questions are, they don’t give you a detailed measurement framework. To produce useful and actionable information, you need a market research methodology, with clear KPIs that can be tracked over time.

For this, Linkfluence developed its ‘ADPR measurement framework’.

Our ADPR measurement framework

When it comes to tracking social brand equity, Linkfluence’s goal was to find a consistent and comparable measurement framework any business can use.

To do this, it needed to define a set of metrics to match the conversations taking place on social media, rather than outdated metrics for traditional formats like TV or newspaper advertising.

Here’s what that looks like:

The ADPR framework focuses on the following measurable (but non-exhaustive) KPIs:

By tracking these KPIs on an ongoing and real-time basis, brands can get a detailed representation of their brand equity, and can compare it to their competitors.

Using the ADPR framework in real time

One of the major limitations of traditional methods of brand equity tracking – like questionnaires, focus groups, and interviews – is their static nature.

Because of how long it takes, and how costly it is, traditional brand equity tracking is usually done annually, or bi-yearly at best, so you only get answers at a fixed point in time, and the results are hard to compare from year to year.

Social listening changes all that.

Rather than relying on pre-built and closed questionnaires, you can monitor online discussion in real-time, identifying emerging consumer trends from current data.

What’s more, brands can access the data whenever they like, and can compare time periods to identify trends and patterns.

Doing so, however, requires us to set a few parameters first:

Once you’ve finalized these factors, you can start to answer some of the more specific questions above, and can aggregate the results into a single picture of social brand equity.

A visual representation of the ADPR framework could look like this: 

This is an example of two competitors mapped out against the ADPR framework.

While ‘Brand A’ outperforms ‘Brand B’ in terms of consumer awareness and brand desirability, Brand B is viewed as being more engaging with its customer base, and more consistent with its brand pillars.

What can you do with this information?

To begin with, Brand A could focus on reflecting its brand pillars more closely within its advertising campaigns. while Brand B could invest in a broader marketing approach, boosting a wider awareness of its products.

Obviously, this is just one way to compare two brands and one way to leverage the information. The possibilities are, quite literally, endless.

Measuring social brand equity: the practical benefits

Enough about the theoretical stuff. Now, we’ll run through the practical benefits of measuring your social brand equity with the ADPR framework.

Fine-tuning your marketing activities

Rather than getting a broad and simplistic description of social brand equity, you could pinpoint precisely where your brand is underperforming in terms of product awareness and desirability, enabling you to focus on expanding and emphasizing marketing efforts in specific channels.

Setting smarter engagement targets

Defining concrete targets beyond vanity metrics is one of the biggest challenges for social media teams. Once you start measuring your equity using awareness KPIs, like the share of voice and geolocation, you can set informed social media engagement targets across different markets. Which brand pillars or values would you like to improve on over the next quarter? Social brand equity helps define your goals in concrete terms.

Getting closer to your customers

By tracking your social brand equity, you can learn how consumers appropriate and relate to your brand. For example, Aperol could detect their brand’s “moments of consumption” and find a higher level of enthusiasm for its Spritz products during the hot summer months.

They could then leverage this in their marketing campaign messaging or in choosing the right bars or on-trade partners to work with.

Proactively managing your online reputation

Tracking social brand equity enables you to proactively manage your online reputation, identifying risks and threats to brand equity as early as possible. This puts you in a better position to manage consumer concerns following emerging crises and would make it easier to contain or reverse the damage to your brand.

Understanding your competitors

Social brand equity is never measured in a silo, but always in comparison to other brands in your market. This helps you map out your competitive landscape, and helps you understand how visible or desirable each competing brand is. You can then use this information as inspiration for future marketing campaigns, as well as pinpointing product features to highlight, or customer segments to target.

Customizing the framework to suit your needs

No two brands are quite the same when it comes to tracking social brand equity.

For some businesses, awareness might be more important than brand desirability – in this case, you can adjust the measurement metrics to focus more on the overall share of voice than on sentiments associated with a brand.

For some specific situations, a little notoriety can be a good thing. For example, ‘Dad Shoes’ might be an acquired taste, but the brands producing them might be happy if part of the online discussion is critical, providing it’s still driving product visibility.

Some brands will focus more on tracking their awareness, while others are more interested in their relevance. That decision is yours. In short, ADPR framework is simply a customizable toolkit to measure your business and brand goals.

Stay on top of social brand equity with social listening

Defining and monitoring your social brand equity doesn’t have to be rocket science. By asking simple questions, and using the power of social listening, companies can get a detailed and picture of their social brand equity in real time.

Tracking social brand equity enables you to channel the billions of spontaneous interactions happening on social media. This complements existing research methods while providing a greater weight of explorable data.

Once you’ve defined your brand pillars and set your KPIs, there’s no need to wait until the next quarter to track your performance – you can start doing so right away.

This not only makes your brand equity tracking more responsive, but it also enables you to better understand the intangible part of brand equity: how people perceive and relate to your brand.

This content was originally published here.

Related posts

Trump’s 2020 attack strategy: Smear Biden over mental fitness By Eric Bradner, Ryan Nobles and Dan Merica, CNN President Donald Trump and his allies have zeroed-in on an attack against Joe Biden, going after the presumptive Democratic governmental nominee’s mental physical fitness in a coordinated effort using smears and innuendo to paint him as ill-quipped to be President of the United States. Trump for months has questioned the mental skill of the opponent he calls “Drowsy Joe.” Trump last week described Biden as “a sleepy person in a basement of a home,” and he has actually repeatedly recommended that Biden did not personally write declarations issued by his project criticizing Trump’s handling of the coronavirus pandemic. His project and the Republican National Committee have progressively focused its attacks on Biden’s tendency for on-camera verbal stumbles in recent weeks, as it looks for to define Biden after he emerged triumphant from the Democratic primary. One example came previously this month, when Trump’s campaign launched an ad comparing Biden and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, which closed with the line: “At least Bernie remembers his positions.” The attacks are an early demonstration of how Trump will utilize the full Republican politician Celebration apparatus to run a scorched-earth campaign based upon personal insults and unwarranted insinuations– a heightened variation of his playbook from 2016, when Trump and his allies, without proof, called into question Hillary Clinton’s health. They have actually become a daily occurrence from Trump’s campaign, assistants and Republican allies throughout every medium possible– on social media, in campaign e-mail blasts and videos and on Trump-aligned media companies like Fox News. Biden’s advisers and Democratic allies mention that Trump is guilty of many of the same verbal tics he is attacking Biden over, and often lies and embraces conspiracy theories. As one Biden ally put it: “Has Trump taken his own guidance and downed a gallon of bleach yet?” The attacks weaponize Biden’s propensity to stumble over words, utilize the wrong word or interrupt himself in the middle of long answers by stating, “anyhow,” and altering course. To fans of a former vice president who in December 2018 called himself a “gaffe maker,” those long-time spoken tics have always belonged to Biden’s public persona. They are made more forgivable to his advocates by Biden’s openness about conquering a stutter. Aside from periodic jousts amongst assistants on Twitter, Biden’s project has mostly neglected the Trump project’s attacks. Biden-world’s view is that the political and media landscape has actually shifted because 2016, when every Trump attack on a rival was treated as novel and took command of the project narrative on social media and cable news. His consultants pointed to Trump’s stopped working efforts to guide the political discussion in the 2017 Virginia governor’s race, when he and his GOP allies cautioned of the MS-13 gang, in addition to the 2018 midterms, when Trump’s message concentrated on caravans of refugees approaching the US-Mexico border. ” The misapprehension that whatever Trump wishes to speak about is inherently efficient and that he gets to act as the media’s at-large task editor has actually been closed,” a Biden consultant said. As Biden has adapted to marketing in the age of coronavirus– knocked off the campaign path and rather transmitting occasions and interviews from a transformed rec room in his basement in Delaware– Trump’s project is seizing on every on-camera miscue, with conservative Trump allies such as Fox News host Sean Hannity then magnifying them. ” His sharpness, or absence thereof is on screen every day, every time he talks,” Trump project spokesperson Tim Murtaugh informed CNN in response to concerns about the technique. “His failure to keep a train of thought going is obvious.” Biden frequently looks down at his notes, which Trump’s allies have actually mischaracterized as Biden dropping off to sleep. Trump’s boy Eric Trump tweeted a seven-second video from Biden’s online broadcast with Hillary Clinton on Tuesday, along with the hashtag “#SleepyJoe.”. Robby Mook, Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign supervisor, said Trump “always projects his biggest weakens on his challenger in an attempt to deflect criticism from himself.”. ” What is very clear is the White Home thinks his presidency will be evaluated on how properly he is managing coronavirus, so it makes ideal sense that he is now attempting to accuse his challenger of incompetence, which is ridiculous.”. The attacks resemble how Trump’s campaign pursued Clinton in 2016, Mook noted. Trump and his campaign frequently cast the former secretary of state as sick or unhealthy, a technique that was further elevated after Clinton stumbled after a September 11 occasion in New York due to concealed pneumonia. ” I simply see a pattern regularly from 2016 all the way through now, which is, he attempts to predict his most significant issues onto his opponents so he gives the media a false equivalence to attempt to muddy the water,” Mook stated. “Part of the factor he was so obsessed with calling Hillary Clinton dishonest is because he is probably the most deceitful individual to win the White Home.”. Biden advisers argue that Trump’s efforts to caricature Biden won’t overcome the same qualities that insulated him in the Democratic primary: After 5 decades in the public eye and eight years as President Barack Obama’s No. 2, voters feel like they know him. Biden frequently expresses distaste for attacks on his rivals’ character. His aides say that by questioning Biden’s mental capability, the President is guiding the project toward concerns of character and fitness. ” This is asinine to tee up– since it’s 10,000 times even worse for him,” a Biden adviser stated. As an example of how easily Trump could be parodied, Biden’s assistants indicated a video from The Daily Show in which Fox News hosts and analysts’ comments about Biden’s mental skill were interspersed with videos of Trump’s own verbal flubs. Biden spokesman Andrew Bates tweeted The Daily Program’s video, which has been seen 3.6 million times on Twitter, on March 25, in action to Trump spokesperson Matt Wolking tweeting: “When is the last time Joe Biden was lucid?”. ” Triggering voters to assess prospects’ mental states is a devastating proposal for Donald Trump, so we’re never going to prevent him from going there,” Bates said. – CNNPolitics.

Authentication failed. No user with this email address found. This content was originally published here.