How Social Network Influences Everyone IRL – The Social Media Monthly

How Social Media Influences All of Us IRL 

Social Media is a controversial topic in today’s world. Its effects on the real life of individuals are debated by numerous psychologists, sociologists, and marketing specialists. At the beginning of its era, Social Media’s purpose was socialization between individuals from all around the world. However, nowadays, it fulfills many other purposes apart from socialization such as promoting products and services, sharing information about multiple topics, and promoting and organizing social gatherings in real life for various purposes. In today’s world, information and communication are both crucial for all aspects of our lives and Social Media platforms have made both of them more efficient and more rapid than ever before.

The use of Social Media by today’s generations seems to have both positive and negative effects leading to a formation of doubts by specialists who analyze its effects. Considering the context of the international debate of specialists on whether Social Media is negatively affecting our generations or helping them become better versions of themselves, let’s see what are the real effects are on our real lives.

Information Exchange

Words such as “like” or “share” have completely different meanings in today’s societies of individuals who are frequent users of Social Media. We know them as tools used on Social Media platforms to share our preferences, hobbies and interests. By posting any type of content online, we are sharing information without realizing the effect. When spending time on social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, or Twitter we are not learning in the same way as when we read a book. The large volume of information we absorb on Social Media platforms is inevitably bringing a contribution to our baggage of knowledge. Whether it is a photo, a video, or the status of one of our virtual friends we are constantly learning something new. There have been debates regarding the quality of content found on these platforms since any individual has the freedom and the opportunity to share any opinion or perspective regardless of truth or fact. Each of us has the responsibility to filter all the information that we receive and choose which one is beneficial for us or not. Moreover, as long as you only follow Social Media pages or individuals who share the same perspectives as you, you can avoid having to see any type of content about subjects which you find irrelevant or offensive to your value system.

Isn’t it weird how we all have hundreds of followers and friends in the virtual world of Social Media while in real life we only know a few of them?  Scientists have proven that an individual is able to maintain real-life social interactions with a very small number of people which is why they believe that the virtual socialization is, in fact, a charade which is far from the real purpose of social interactions. While some individuals claim that Social Media platforms will revolutionize social interactions, there are others who believe that they will tragically damage real-life socialization. Considering this strong debate of the dilemma of virtual or real-life socialization, there are few aspects which need to be mentioned. Indeed, social interactions in the virtual world on Social Media platforms seem to be far from reality, but can definitely take to real-life socialization due to the fact that people who start chatting online can definitely take it to the next level and meet in real life. Also, imagine how difficult it was back in the days before internet and technology became crucial aspects of our lives to maintain contact with people who were traveling to the other part of the world or to do a reverse phone lookup to find out relevant information about the person with whom you are dealing with. With the help of the internet and Social Media platforms we can easily connect with people from every corner of the world within seconds. It might be true that intensive use of Social Media for social interactions with the people around us can lead to the development of communication problems in real life; typing in front of a computer or a mobile phone screen is completely different than talking to a person face-to-face. But it is again a matter of choice whether you choose to take your eyes out of your phone and enjoy the people that surround you or focus all your social interactions in the virtual world. So, we can’t really blame Social Media platforms, can we?

Marketing is another field of interest which has been powerfully changed by the appearance of the internet and Social Media platforms. It is crucial to see how it affects our relationship with real life.  You do not have to be a marketing specialist to notice how today Social Media platforms are used for marketing by every business. We have all noticed on our pages on Social Media platforms that products and services are constantly promoted, especially those we have searched for in the past. So, are Social Media platforms affecting customer behavior trends in any way?  It is obvious that since the purchasing process is more simple and quick, customers tend to buy more products they may or may not need due to the constant access to deals and sales offered by businesses. Another aspect of change in marketing is the relationship between business owners and customers.  Customer satisfaction has improved drastically thanks to easier and faster access to customer feedback.  This not only leads to happy repeat buyers, but also innovation and product development.

Related posts

Trump’s 2020 attack strategy: Smear Biden over mental fitness By Eric Bradner, Ryan Nobles and Dan Merica, CNN President Donald Trump and his allies have zeroed-in on an attack against Joe Biden, going after the presumptive Democratic governmental nominee’s mental physical fitness in a coordinated effort using smears and innuendo to paint him as ill-quipped to be President of the United States. Trump for months has questioned the mental skill of the opponent he calls “Drowsy Joe.” Trump last week described Biden as “a sleepy person in a basement of a home,” and he has actually repeatedly recommended that Biden did not personally write declarations issued by his project criticizing Trump’s handling of the coronavirus pandemic. His project and the Republican National Committee have progressively focused its attacks on Biden’s tendency for on-camera verbal stumbles in recent weeks, as it looks for to define Biden after he emerged triumphant from the Democratic primary. One example came previously this month, when Trump’s campaign launched an ad comparing Biden and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, which closed with the line: “At least Bernie remembers his positions.” The attacks are an early demonstration of how Trump will utilize the full Republican politician Celebration apparatus to run a scorched-earth campaign based upon personal insults and unwarranted insinuations– a heightened variation of his playbook from 2016, when Trump and his allies, without proof, called into question Hillary Clinton’s health. They have actually become a daily occurrence from Trump’s campaign, assistants and Republican allies throughout every medium possible– on social media, in campaign e-mail blasts and videos and on Trump-aligned media companies like Fox News. Biden’s advisers and Democratic allies mention that Trump is guilty of many of the same verbal tics he is attacking Biden over, and often lies and embraces conspiracy theories. As one Biden ally put it: “Has Trump taken his own guidance and downed a gallon of bleach yet?” The attacks weaponize Biden’s propensity to stumble over words, utilize the wrong word or interrupt himself in the middle of long answers by stating, “anyhow,” and altering course. To fans of a former vice president who in December 2018 called himself a “gaffe maker,” those long-time spoken tics have always belonged to Biden’s public persona. They are made more forgivable to his advocates by Biden’s openness about conquering a stutter. Aside from periodic jousts amongst assistants on Twitter, Biden’s project has mostly neglected the Trump project’s attacks. Biden-world’s view is that the political and media landscape has actually shifted because 2016, when every Trump attack on a rival was treated as novel and took command of the project narrative on social media and cable news. His consultants pointed to Trump’s stopped working efforts to guide the political discussion in the 2017 Virginia governor’s race, when he and his GOP allies cautioned of the MS-13 gang, in addition to the 2018 midterms, when Trump’s message concentrated on caravans of refugees approaching the US-Mexico border. ” The misapprehension that whatever Trump wishes to speak about is inherently efficient and that he gets to act as the media’s at-large task editor has actually been closed,” a Biden consultant said. As Biden has adapted to marketing in the age of coronavirus– knocked off the campaign path and rather transmitting occasions and interviews from a transformed rec room in his basement in Delaware– Trump’s project is seizing on every on-camera miscue, with conservative Trump allies such as Fox News host Sean Hannity then magnifying them. ” His sharpness, or absence thereof is on screen every day, every time he talks,” Trump project spokesperson Tim Murtaugh informed CNN in response to concerns about the technique. “His failure to keep a train of thought going is obvious.” Biden frequently looks down at his notes, which Trump’s allies have actually mischaracterized as Biden dropping off to sleep. Trump’s boy Eric Trump tweeted a seven-second video from Biden’s online broadcast with Hillary Clinton on Tuesday, along with the hashtag “#SleepyJoe.”. Robby Mook, Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign supervisor, said Trump “always projects his biggest weakens on his challenger in an attempt to deflect criticism from himself.”. ” What is very clear is the White Home thinks his presidency will be evaluated on how properly he is managing coronavirus, so it makes ideal sense that he is now attempting to accuse his challenger of incompetence, which is ridiculous.”. The attacks resemble how Trump’s campaign pursued Clinton in 2016, Mook noted. Trump and his campaign frequently cast the former secretary of state as sick or unhealthy, a technique that was further elevated after Clinton stumbled after a September 11 occasion in New York due to concealed pneumonia. ” I simply see a pattern regularly from 2016 all the way through now, which is, he attempts to predict his most significant issues onto his opponents so he gives the media a false equivalence to attempt to muddy the water,” Mook stated. “Part of the factor he was so obsessed with calling Hillary Clinton dishonest is because he is probably the most deceitful individual to win the White Home.”. Biden advisers argue that Trump’s efforts to caricature Biden won’t overcome the same qualities that insulated him in the Democratic primary: After 5 decades in the public eye and eight years as President Barack Obama’s No. 2, voters feel like they know him. Biden frequently expresses distaste for attacks on his rivals’ character. His aides say that by questioning Biden’s mental capability, the President is guiding the project toward concerns of character and fitness. ” This is asinine to tee up– since it’s 10,000 times even worse for him,” a Biden adviser stated. As an example of how easily Trump could be parodied, Biden’s assistants indicated a video from The Daily Show in which Fox News hosts and analysts’ comments about Biden’s mental skill were interspersed with videos of Trump’s own verbal flubs. Biden spokesman Andrew Bates tweeted The Daily Program’s video, which has been seen 3.6 million times on Twitter, on March 25, in action to Trump spokesperson Matt Wolking tweeting: “When is the last time Joe Biden was lucid?”. ” Triggering voters to assess prospects’ mental states is a devastating proposal for Donald Trump, so we’re never going to prevent him from going there,” Bates said. – CNNPolitics.

Authentication failed. No user with this email address found. This content was originally published here.