VIDEO: Foreperson In Roger Stone Case Had Considerable Bias Based On Social Media Postings
The foreperson in Roger Stone’s case seems to have a strong predisposition versus Pres. Trump’s long-time confidant which information have come to light, which could wind up providing Stone a brand-new trial.
Hart’s social media shenanigans consist of buffooning Stone’s fans on Twitter after they were enraged when he was detained in a significant pre-dawn raid by a federal tactical team to be extreme force, which many called unneeded.
She has actually also recommended that Trump supporters, together with the Commander-in-chief, are racist, and there are reports that she preferred the Russia examination performed by Unique Counsel Robert Mueller, which ultimately resulted in Stone’s prosecution.
MORE NEWS: [VIDEO] Dairy Farmer Schools Joaquin Phoenix’s Over His Anti-Milk Oscar Rant ‘We Feed the World– What Do You Do?’
Now it appears like the fore person in the jury, in the Roger Stone case, had substantial bias. Add that to whatever else, and this is not looking helpful for the “Justice” Department. @foxandfriends @FoxNews
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 13, 2020
President Trump stepped up his criticism of Justice Department prosecutors on Thursday worrying previous project adviser Roger Stone’s criminal trial, after it was reported that the jury foreperson had published anti-Trump and anti-Stone messages online.
A spokesman for Stone also told Fox News they were evaluating the brand-new reports and considering their next relocation. “Mr. Stone and his defense group are vigilantly evaluating the freshly reported details to determine any suitable next actions,” the spokesperson said in a statement.
The juror in concern, Tomeka Hart, supposedly mentioned Wednesday that she was the foreperson and safeguarded federal district attorneys who advised approximately nine years in prison for Stone, only to withdraw from the case after senior DOJ officials submitted a brand-new filing that recommended a lighter sentence. Soon afterward, her history of Democratic advocacy and a string of her anti-Trump, left-wing social networks posts emerged. [Fox News]
Much for “impartiality” for this Democrat juror. She must have told the judge that she could not be reasonable since of her predisposition against Roger Stone and Pres. Trump. Thank God she doesn’t teach any of my kids.
MORE NEWS: Warren Mercilessly Shredded For Bragging About Accepting “Last $3 Dollars” From Broke College Advocate
Pretty sure the juror lied during jury selection, plus they were tweeting during the trial (Social network is usually prohibited when you’re on a jury). This isn’t a reason; it’s a legitimate complaint with this juror and a perfect reason to get a brand-new trial.
At least, Stone’s conviction should be tossed out, and he ought to be retried with an unbiased jury. The best thing that might occur is to toss out all charges against anyone that was swept up in this false, corrupt investigation due to prosecutorial misconduct.
Jurors are expected to be neutral and have no understanding of the individual or have any opinion on anything to do with the trial.
I have actually been released more than when on jury task simply for knowing the accused or learning more about the case in advance. That’s why federal cases including politicians and political crimes need to be tried at places selected arbitrarily across the nation.
MORE NEWS: Report: Cook County District Attorney Kim Foxx Melts Down Over Smollett Indictment … Blames Trump
DNC activists on DC juries make it difficult to get legitimate justice. They acquit all Democrats like the pedophile Dem Sen. Robert Menendez and Obama’s former attorney (a Manafort co-conspirator with the very same proof and same criminal activities) and discover anybody related to the GOP and trump guilty despite the strength of the case on either side.
There’s a jury choice procedure called ‘voir dire’ in which potential jurors have to address questions about possible biases and activities that would disqualify them so you don’t get some crusader on a Jury that looks for to affect the verdict. Appears like the Hart individual LIED UNDER OATH about her background.
What Individuals Read On WayneDupree.com
The post VIDEO: Foreperson In Roger Stone Case Had Significant Bias Based On Social Media Postings appeared first on WayneDupree.com.
This content was originally published here.